Corporate Governance Guidelines for Non-Bank Payment Service Providers: Implications for Uganda and Comparative Insights

KAMPALA, March 11, 2026 — As Uganda’s digital economy pivots from infancy to systemic maturity, the Bank of Uganda [BOU] has recently released to its licensees, draft Corporate Governance Guidelines for Non-Bank Payment Service Providers [NBPSPs], Payment System Operators [PSOs] and Issuers of Payment Instruments [IPIs] [Guidelines], representing a watershed moment in regulatory oversight. For years, the agility of NBPSPs and PSOs has outpaced the rigid structures of traditional banking; however these new Guidelines signal that the move fast and break things era is now being replaced by a standard of institutional permanence.

By codifying Board compositions, risk management frameworks and fiduciary duties specifically for PSPs, the Central Bank is not merely adding red-tape — it is laying the governance infrastructure necessary to attract large scale cross-border investment. When viewed through a comparative lens, it becomes clear that the Pearl of Africa is seeking a middle path between innovation and systemic stability.

Board of Directors

Board Charter & Committees

Appointment of Senior Management

Enterprise Risk Management Framework

Internal Audit Function

Financial & Systems Audit Reporting

ESG Reporting

Corrective & Remedial Measures

In cases of non-compliance with the Guidelines, the BOU may apply corrective actions under the principal Act, including suspension or revocation of licences.

Regulatory Comparison

Kenya

Kenya is often viewed as the gold standard for fintech regulation in Africa, largely because the Central Bank of Kenya [CBK] allowed the market to innovate first before tightening the governance screws.

Many PSPs in Kenya are subsidiaries of larger entities or telecoms. The CBK enforces ring-fencing guidelines that require PSP Boards to have autonomous decision-making power separate from the parent company — a tighter approach to local autonomy than Uganda’s Guidelines currently provide.

In Kenya, IT Governance is not a sub-committee — it is a Board-level liability. If a PSP experiences a major outage, the Board, not the CTO, can be held personally liable. Directors must therefore be tech-literate beyond an elementary level.

One could argue Uganda’s Guidelines should adopt a similar technical governance standard to maintain a robustly governed ecosystem with granular liability.

Ghana

In 2025, the Central Bank of Ghana [CBG] issued corporate governance Guidelines for PSPs establishing key rules on Board structure, executive responsibility, internal controls and risk oversight. Ghana is often cited as a peer for Uganda given its rapid mobile money penetration and payments law heritage.

Similar to Uganda, Ghana’s Guidelines are prescriptive for larger players. Dedicated electronic money issuers and enhanced PSPs must have at least one-third of the Board as independent non-executive directors, with independence defined strictly — prohibiting any director with more than a 5 percent equity stake or significant business ties.

Ghana’s “anti-entrenchment” measures cap non-executive director terms at 4 years (renewable twice) and Board Chair terms at 4 years with only one renewal possible — stricter than traditional banking in many jurisdictions.

The CBG also requires at least 30% Ghanaian Board membership within audit and risk committees — a significant consideration for multinationals like MTN, Airtel and Wave operating across East Africa.

Conclusion

The regulatory trajectories of Uganda, Kenya and Ghana reveal a shared truth: the fintech honeymoon is over, and the era of institutional maturity has arrived. On the horizon for Uganda, we can expect three distinct shifts.

Resilience Governance

The Central Bank moves from checklist compliance to operational resilience as the primary measure of institutional health.

Regional Harmonisation

As the EAC cross-border payment system gains steam, these governance standards will become the minimum entry requirement for Ugandan firms scaling into the wider East African monetary union.

Governance as an Asset Class

In a tightening global capital market, players with a BOU-compliant, transparent and independent Board will be the only ones capable of attracting the next wave of international investment.

Ultimately, the Guidelines do not just tether NBPSPs and PSOs to a Regulator — they provide the legal gravity necessary for Uganda’s digital economy to finally reach escape velocity.

Authors: Hezekiah Nsubuga Mubiru, Senior Associate; Denise Namugga, Junior Associate, AF Mpanga

Source: AF Mpanga

https://thecooperator.news/new-report-reveals-continued-growth-in-africas-instant-payment-systems/

Buy your copy of thecooperator magazine from one of our country-wide vending points or an e-copy on emag.thecooperator.news

Exit mobile version